Talk:Objects/@comment-71.121.241.2-20200320191752/@comment-32994377-20200423230122

Although you are correct that you're not alone on this, there are two inherent problems with this plan: this would end up with a quite sizable number of neccesarily very short (1-2 paragraph) pages, and, as each page would have to have a name, it would designate one term as the "main" name, thus leading back to people arguing about which it ought to be. In short, although it's reasonable in theory, it would be counterproductive in the long run (unless, perhaps, all those pages were protected, which would also be unconstructive). (If you have questions about this, please see the connected policy page, which has the background for the current state of affairs.)